Discussion about this post

User's avatar
the incident report's avatar

I think your article about our city council races would have been more useful if it had included, not only the unsurprising fact that we live in a small town with overlapping relationships, but also the platforms of the candidates, rather than reducing them to members of Communist or Marxist organizations. Forgive me if I'm wrong in thinking your article smacks of red-baiting.

I was particularly curious about the inclusion of our mayor, Charles Maughan. You post a photo from 2019, with Charles at a table with Platypus, an organization said to be dedicated to the study of left politics, particularly Marxism. Another photo shows a campaign kickoff for Danielle Chambers, who Charles has endorsed. You act as if his attendance is nefarious and not, simply, normal.

Not to disparage Marxists or Communists –– our mayor is a proud Social Democrat––but I've seen Charles at many events and in the company of many types of people. You might find photos of him at town halls, state of the city addresses; Chamber of Commerce, Corvallis Pride, community radio, Fall Festival, Septemberfest, sustainability town halls, the Sager concerts, the public Hanukkah celebration, and Mayors for Peace events; or groundbreaking and ribbon cuttings for housing, ODOT, Benton County, and local businesses. I've run into him at the No Kings rally, at Open Streets, the Farmer's Market, and The Reader's Choice Award.

In short, Charles shows up.

I realize the point of this article was the overlapping nature of our local politicians, but its narrow and distorting lens, especially given the fact The Inquirer seems to have written nothing else about these political figures and particularly in an election year, when we need real information, is a disservice.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?